During this time of the year, many residents throughout the area pull out their all-terrain vehicles (ATV) to carouse the town, or for some off-road run. The weather pefect, the sun is shining and residents get to enjoy some time away from work and school.

ATV accidents can ruin an otherwise good time and can often be quite serious. In recent weeks, there have been at least three ATV accidents in Bartholomew County and elsewhere nearby. According to NECN, officials are taking these accidents as a warning and are working to raise awareness about the dangers through the summer and fall riding seasons.One of the first accidents happened near Indianapolis when a 14-year-old was riding his ATV on South County Road. When he swerved to miss a dog, his ATV flipped over and landed on top of him. The young rider was taken to Columbus Regional Hospital where he was treated for a broken leg.

Our Highland personal injury attorneys understand that a man from Scipio died last month after an ATV accident in northwest Jennings County. This rider died as a result of blunt force trauma to the head. This ATV accident happened as a result of loose gravel and asphalt on the side of the road.

Also in June, two young girls suffered from serious head injuries after they were thrown from an ATV that their father was driving. This ATV accident was a rollover as well. In both of these incidents, none of the riders were wearing a helmet or any other form of safety equipment.

Some ATV accidents can lead to injuries as minor as bruises, burns, scrapes and cuts. But each year there are riders who die or suffer life-altering brain injuries. Regardless, ATV injuries of all kinds can be minimized when the proper safety precautions are taken and safe driving habits are practiced.

Make sure that riders always wear protective equipment. Never allow a young rider to ride an ATV that’s suitable for an adult. Make sure that each rider is riding on an age-appropriate ATV. Children’s ATVs are typically slower and smaller. It’s also a wise idea to stay off of our state’s roadways and stay away from cars and trucks.

Believe it or not, ATVs are not designed to be ridden on the road. Their steering systems and brakes are designed for off-road use. In many Indiana counties it’s even illegal to ride these vehicles on roads.

According to ATVSafety.com, there were more than 315 people who died in ATV accidents across the U.S. in 2010. In addition to these fatalities, there were another 120,000 people injured.

We’re asking all riders to make sure that they’re using these vehicles safely and correctly. These accidents are avoidable with safe and smart riding practices. Be safe and enjoy!
Continue reading

Many might think that the summer is a time for care-free fun, vacations and sunshine. Unfortunately, we face some serious risks for accidents in Highland and throughout Northern Indiana through the long, hot summer months. Not only do we face risks for auto accidents because of the increase in traffic over the summer travel season, but we also face severe risks for heat injuries with the rising temps.Our Highland personal injury attorneys understand that many people use the summer season for those much-needed vacations. When more people hit the road, our risks for accidents skyrocket. To help shift the focus back on safety, officials with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) released Cool Tips for a Safe Summer Trip.

Preparation can be your key to avoiding a potentially fatal accident.

One of the most beneficial things you can do is to avoid dangerous driving behaviors. Officials urge you to stay calm behind the wheel. With all of the traffic, we can only expect congested roadways and traffic delays. You’re asked to plan ahead for these scenarios. Leave for your destination with plenty of time to spare. You’ll also want to check weather and traffic reports so that you can plan the smoothest trip possible.

It’s also a good idea to stay focused on the road. You want to be aware of your surroundings at all times. This means keep distractions out of the driver’s seat. When operating a motor vehicle, you should never talk on a cell phone, text message, eat, drink, apply makeup, play with the radio or operate a GPS system. If you have to do any of these, you should first pull over to a safe location and stop the car. Lastly, make sure that everyone in your vehicle is wearing their seat belt during each and every car ride.

Officials are also speaking out about the dangers of the heat! Heat illnesses are extremely likely during this time of the year. Highland has been seeing temps in the mid to upper 90s.

Anyone and everyone is vulnerable in this heat. Young children, our pets and elderly residents are some of the most likely to be injured by a heat illness. Those who are facing health problems, those who abuse alcohol and drugs and those who like to exercise are also highly susceptible to these kinds of injuries. Officials with the National Safety Council (NSC) are working to make sure that everyone knows what to do in the event of heatstroke, heat exhaustion or heat cramps.

How to treat a heat injury:

-Call 9-1-1.

-Move the person to a cool place.

-Remove any excess clothing.

-Cool them as quickly as possible. You can apply cool cloths to their neck or groin.

-Give the person some water or a sports drink.
Continue reading

New statistics illustrate that there was a near 5 percent decrease in the number of alcohol-impaired-driving fatalities from 2009 to 2010.

Unfortunately, there was also a decrease in the total number of vehicle miles driven during this time too, illustrating that the risks are just about the same.

According to the most recent release from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), there were close to 10,250 people who were killed in alcohol-related traffic accidents in Highland and elsewhere. Experts have concluded that someone was killed in one of these accidents every 51 minutes throughout the year. What’s most alarming is that all of these fatalities could have been prevented. Drunk driving is 100 percent avoidable!Our Highland injury lawyers understand that there roughly 220 people who were killed in alcohol-related car accidents in the state of Indiana in 2010. These accidents accounted for about 30 percent of all of the traffic-related fatalities in the state for the entire year. About 195 of these people were killed in car accidents that involved a driver who was legally drunk behind the wheel, or returned a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) reading of 0.08 or higher.

In most of these accidents, it’s the intoxicated drivers who are killed, but it’s important to point out that many others are killed and injured, too. In 2010, more than 6,630 of the people who died were the drunk drivers, more than 2,870 were motor vehicle occupants and another 730 were nonoccupants. Drivers and other travelers along our roadways are asked to be careful out there and to be mindful of the driving of others. Practice your most defensive driving habits every time you’re behind the wheel to help to keep yourself out of a potentially fatal accident.

To make these matters even worse, about 1,200 people who were killed in these kinds of accidents were kids who were 14-years-old or younger.

Travelers are asked to be extremely cautious during the evening hours and during the weekends. These are the times when we typically see higher numbers of these types of accidents.

To help you to avoid one of these accidents, the Indiana Criminal Justice Institute’s Traffic Safety Division offers these safety tips:

-Plan ahead. If you’re going to be out drinking, be sure to designate a sober driver before starting your evening. Give that person your keys.

-If you’re impaired, call a taxi, use public transit or call a sober friend or family member to come get you. Keep driving out of the mix. You should never consider getting behind the wheel, no matter how little you think you’ve had.

-Stay the night at a friend or a family member’s house.

-Be sure to report any driver that you suspect is drunk to local authorities. Reporting these drivers can help to save lives.

-Always wear your seat belt. This is probably your best defense against an drunk driver.
Continue reading

As with nearly every other facet of our lives, technology is fast becoming an integral tool for those seeking an Indiana divorce.There are currently state-specific apps that help you calculate child support fees or figure what a divide of marital assets will look like.

However, there is absolutely no substitute for an experienced Indiana divorce lawyer. Trying to go it alone in court with your smart phone is anything but smart.

That said, these calculators can give you a good idea ahead of time of what the cost estimates will be and can help you to get organized. This is an important step in the process before you even walk out the door.

What you have to be wary of is the fact that each state has its own specific laws with regard to divorce. It’s not like tax law or immigration law, where the rules are going to be the same across the board.

In some states, you can get a fairly accurate idea of what a divorce is going to cost you in terms of legal fees and support payments, based on the length of marriage, the time it takes to sort through the affairs, the age of your children and so on.

Another, powered by Google play, purports to offer a general estimate of what your child support payments are going to be, though it is careful to say that it’s only an estimate and does not constitute actual legal advice from a professional.

An app in New Jersey allows you to do an inventory of marital assets. Sorting out who gets what can be a difficult and emotional process. It doesn’t hurt to be prepared, and if technology can help you do that, by all means, use it as a guideline and a tool. But again, make sure you consult with your attorney before you make any agreements or formalize any of it.

An app called the Divorce Journal allows you to keep digital notes regarding the divorce. Recording your thoughts and feelings can be therapeutic, allowing you to sort through the emotional turbulence and upheaval that a divorce can cause. Just be sure that those notes remain private and don’t fall into the wrong hands, as you don’t want any surprises showing up in court.

These apps can also be helpful in terms of helping you keep track of upcoming court dates, attorney appointments or any other aspect you want to be able to keep track of. Missing a hearing could be detrimental to your case, so if technology helps you stay on top of it, use it!

Some have also found certain apps helpful in divorces where physical abuse is a factor. One in particular allows you to collect photographic and audio evidence of the alleged abuse, which can be valuable not only in your divorce and child custody proceedings, but also in a criminal proceeding.

And then, once the divorce is final, some have found that communicating digitally for things such as child visitation or custody issues helps to keep the peace. When ex-spouses don’t have to actually speak to one another, sometimes that’s best for everyone.
Continue reading

In military families, we know that spouses endure just as much as the soldiers.Indiana divorce attorneys also know that the rigors and stress of military life are sometimes simply too much for people to overcome. It inevitably tears them apart.

It’s true that not all Indiana divorces are the same, and when it comes to military families, special considerations must be made.

That was apparent in the recent Alaska Supreme Court ruling of Villars v. Villars. Of course, divorce law varies from state-to-state, but the general principle here remains the same.

In this case, the core issue was that of benefits. It was not a matter of if the military member’s former spouse was entitled to said benefits, but when.

Here’s what we know of the case, as provided in the Supreme Court’s 17-page opinion:

The Villars, Richard and Kathleen, were married in 1984. Eighteen years later, they filed for divorce. Throughout the course of their union, Richard had served in the U.S. Air Force, and then later in the Alaska Air National Guard.

The couple agreed, prior to signing off on the divorce, that each would get half of the marital estate. This included any retirement benefits that Richard may receive, should he receive them. At the time, it was expected that he would begin collection of these benefits when he turned 60 years-old, although this was never expressly stated in the signed paperwork. However, he began collecting them in 2009, at age 48.

When Kathleen learned of this, she took him to court, asserting that she was entitled to half of the benefits, per their divorce agreement. Her ex-husband, on the other hand, stated that she should not receive any portion of the benefits until after he turned 60, as was expected when they signed the paperwork.

The case was heard in the state’s superior court, which ultimately sided with Kathleen, saying that the divorce settlement was unambiguous, and the clear intent was that the ex-wife would begin receiving payments from the retirement benefit as soon as he began collecting them. The court ordered Richard to repay his ex 50 percent of the benefits he had thus far collected.

Mr. Villars appealed to the Alaska Supreme Court, saying that the lower court improperly modified the divorce settlement. However, the justices affirmed the lower court’s determination.

With military service, retirement benefits factor in a point system, which calculates when benefits can be paid out in a reservist system versus an active system. Richard had worked full-time up until the divorce and part-time thereafter. Those in the reservist system would generally still have to wait until age 60 to collect retirement benefits, while someone in the active system could begin collecting after 20 years, no matter how old he or she is. However, once an individual in the reservist system racks up a certain number of points, they are moved to the active system. This is what happened to Richard.

When his ex learned he began collecting, she filed a request to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service to request her portion be paid to her. That request was initially denied due to a technicality. When Richard learned she was trying to collect, he took her to court, saying she shouldn’t be allowed to collect until he turned 60.

Although the lower court indicated that the age factor was not specifically addressed in the initial settlement, it was clear that the intent of both parties at the time the agreement was signed was to split the benefits 50/50. The fact that Richard began receiving them early, the court ruled, should have no bearing on when his ex could begin receiving them.

In general, it’s important to properly claim retirement funds at the time of a divorce. An experienced divorce attorney in Highland, Gary or elsewhere in Northern Indiana can provide you with more detail.
Continue reading

Child custody cases in Indiana can be contentious no matter what the make-up of the family.However, Indiana child custody attorneys realize that there are unique challenges for families headed by a same-sex couple.

Indiana is not among those states that has approved same-sex marriage, and it is not allowed under federal law according to the Defense of Marriage Act, also known as DOMA. However, a federal appeals ruling last week in Massachusetts (Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. United States Department of Health and Human Services, et. al.) has struck down a key portion of DOMA, saying that for the federal government to deny legally married, same-sex couples health benefits is unconstitutional.

Now, this doesn’t directly affect Indiana – yet. That’s because gay marriage is not legal here anyway. But this ruling could have sweeping implications when the case reaches the U.S. Supreme Court, which is likely to happen, although it’s not clear exactly when.

In the meantime, same-sex couples in Indiana still struggle with how to legally sort through issues of domestic partnerships, child custody and other matters. While some straight couples choose prenuptial agreements prior to marriage, the fact that same-sex couples don’t have the option of getting married in Indiana means they need to seek out a family law attorney who can help ensure their interests are protected – particularly with regard to the children.

Otherwise, what ends up happening is that if the union ends, the one biological parent may get sole legal custody of the child, while the other parent may have no legal rights.

In states where gay couples are allowed to marry, the costs for just about everything family-law related is higher. Consider divorce, for example. Let’s say a legally married gay couple splits. The family court judge orders one spouse to pay spousal support. However, because the union was never recognized by the federal government, that support can not be deducted from federal taxes, as it could be if the two people were of the opposite sex. That could end up costing thousands more dollars in the long run.

Also, same sex couples end up requiring more estate planning. Take for example a same-sex couple who had been married in California, but then moved to Fort Wayne to look after a parent. The pair were able to purchase their home outright, but the state comes down hard on so-called unrelated heirs. This wouldn’t be an issue if the couple were straight, but because Indiana doesn’t recognize the marriage as legal, the pair have had to purchase expensive life insurance to cover the taxes on the house, so that when one passes away, the other will be able to keep the home.

That law in Indiana is thankfully being phased out, but according to federal law, many same-sex couples are still penalized with heavy taxes when they inherit property from their spouse.

End-of-life decisions are also a challenge, as certain states do not recognize a same-sex husband or wife’s right to make decisions for their incapacitated spouse – a right automatically granted to straight married couples. The only way to spell it out is to establish healthcare and financial proxies, wills and powers of attorney.
Continue reading

Indiana divorce attorneys know that the whole process of separation and divorce is emotionally draining. Some days, it can seem a lot easier to just to check out – and not show up to court.Pennington v. Pennington illustrates why this is not a good idea in an Highland divorce case.

This was a situation out of Georgia – and divorce laws vary a great deal from state to state – but the basic principles of this case are still relevant.

The couple were divorced pursuant to a final judgment, which was granted after the wife failed to show up to court for a final hearing regarding child custody. The wife appealed the custody order that was ultimately handed down, but the higher court upheld the original decision, finding no error.

In this case, the couple had been married for 13 years. After that time, the wife filed for divorce, saying that the union was irretrievably broken. The husband also filed for a divorce.

A status conference on the case was held in November of 2010, in which the court indicated it would hold a jury trial sometime the following month. It also underscored to both sides that the Friday prior to the Monday of jury selection for the trial, there would be a final hearing to determine child custody. This is standard practice in Georgia. The day after that status conference, notice was mailed to both sides that the jury trial would be held on December 13. There was also a notice sent to both parties that the final child custody hearing would be held December 10.

On December 9, the husband and wife met outside of court to discuss the custody agreement. However, the wife reportedly refused to sign it.

The following morning – the day of the hearing – the husband reportedly discovered a note on his car windshield that was apparently signed by the wife that said something to the effect that she wanted to agree to the settlement.

However, she chose not to go to court that morning. She didn’t call the court to tell them she wouldn’t be there. And the court couldn’t accept the handwritten note as proof that she had signed off on the agreed settlement.

Without her in the courtroom that day, the judge said he had no choice to but to disregard her pleadings from the docket, which meant he then entered a judgment in favor of the husband, awarding him sole custody of the children.

Now, this would be a crushing blow to anyone. But it didn’t have to happen.

The wife tried to argue subsequently that the court was trying to punish her for not showing up by taking her children and her property. While this may certainly seem like a harsh move, it was not outside the bounds of the law, as the appellate court later decided.

Specifically, the wife was in a vulnerable place and failed to cooperate with the system. Having a qualified divorce attorney at every step of the proceeding is critical to ensuring your interests – and those of your children – are protected.

It is also equally important to make sure that you show up for every court date which you are compelled to attend.
Continue reading

Even though it’s been about a year since teens in our state were banned from texting behind the wheel, about half of all teenage Hoosiers admit to still doing it. With these young drivers out of school, they’ll be hitting the road for what’s become known as the 100 Deadliest Days for car accidents in Highland and elsewhere.

The time between Memorial Day and Labor Day is the deadliest of the year for young drivers, according to INC NOW.For this reason, AT&T members are hitting the road and reaching out to teens across the country through the “It Can Wait” campaign. This is a campaign to get teens to stop texting behind the wheel. Statistics prove that teens between the ages of 13- and 18-years-old send about 60 text messages a day. Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller joined other leaders around the state, AT&T representatives and students at New Tech Academy recently to raise awareness about the importance of keeping their eyes and their mind on the road while keeping electronic devices out of the driver’s seat.

Highland car accident lawyers understand that it’s not only about the safety of these young drivers, it’s also about the responsible motorists that share the road with them. When a driver is distracted, everyone is at risk. To help to educate our state’s teens about these dangers, students were offered a try in a new simulator to see just how good their skills were behind the wheel when engaging in distractions. The simulator showed all of the teens that they were at some serious risks for an accident when they were texting behind the wheel.

“It was hard to see what else was going on. People would just walk out and there were deer and dogs and kids,” said Haleigh Hunly, a student at New Tech Academy.

When it all boils down, a driver who is texting behind the wheel is close to 25 times more likely to get into an accident. There’s no getting around it, texting while driving requires your eyes to come off of the roadway. For text messages, drivers take their eyes of the road for about 4.5 seconds. If you’re driving at 55 miles per hour and text message, then you could drive the length of a football field during that time and never see what’s going on around you.

In the state, drivers who are busted text messaging while driving face a fine of $25. For the second offense and so on and so forth, drivers face a $50 fine. Drivers who are 18-years-old and younger are not only prohibited from talking on a cell phone behind the wheel, but they’re also prohibited from texting, too.

Parents are asked to reinforce our state’s laws and ask their teens to be responsible behind the wheel and to keep the distractions out of the driver’s seat. Working to raise awareness about the risks and consequences of distracted driving can help to improve roadway safety for everyone.
Continue reading

Indiana child custody attorneys wonder if sometimes, we give less say to children than they deserve.Of course, we know that child custody proceedings don’t always have to be acrimonious – and in fact, we do handle all of our cases with the recognition that these are children’s lives we’re talking about. And children, as we know, don’t always recognize what is best for them.

For example, one parent may spoil with lavish gifts and trips, but is not actually fit to care for the child on a 24-7 basis. That can be extremely frustrating for the other parent involved, especially when the child begins to express favor toward the mostly-absentee parent.

However, a recent column written by family therapist Ruth Bettelheim indicates that perhaps we should be ceding some of the say to our youngsters in these cases on a more regular basis.

The issue she really gets at is maybe not so much when child custody arrangements in Indiana are first made. Most parents, even in bitter custody battles, do deep down want what is best for the child – the question is determining what the “best” looks like.

The issue, Bettelheim says, is more when that custody agreement stays stagnant. Essentially what works for a 3-year-old isn’t going to necessarily work for a 12-year-old or a 15-year-old.

But because it may be painful for us as adults to visit, we leave it alone, despite the fact that the current situation may not actually be what the child wants or what is best.

For example, let’s say you’re a 14-year-old whose parents divorced when you were 6. When it first happened, you may have been fine to shuttle to your dad’s house two hours away on the weekends. But now that you are wanting to spend more time with your friends, it seems unfair that you spend weekends two hours away. You may be loath to bring it up with your parents, though, for fear of drudging up past hurts.

Plus, kids have an innate desire to please their parents. They don’t want to disappoint them, so they will suppress expressing what it is they actually want so that they won’t have to feel guilty for “choosing” one parent over the other.

Sometimes, it’s not even so much that one parent may get more time than the other, but that everyone could benefit from some form of modification.

And while some couples may be able to work together to come up with an agreement on their own, old wounds may prevent them from truly being civil with one another. This is where it can really help to bring on an experienced child custody lawyer, who can review all the details of the case and make a new transition as painless as possible.

What Bettelheim proposes is the institution of a mandatory review every couple of years to all child custody cases. She says that doing this – and allowing each child the opportunity to speak privately with a court mediation attorney – would help ensure that the current situation is working for everyone, child included.

However, it isn’t likely that this kind of sweeping legislation would be put into effect anytime soon.

That doesn’t mean, though, that parents can’t take the initiative. It may be somewhat painful at first, but revisiting the custody situation every few years – hearing out your kids and analyzing the scenario from a place of objectivity – can only serve to benefit everyone in the end.
Continue reading

Presenting the evidence of your Highland car accident case can seem daunting. You may be confused over what you need to prove to show that you were not the at-fault party. Our Highland injury attorneys understand your confusion and we want to help you.Arnold v. Wallace is a recent Virginia case arising from a car accident. Mary Arnold (plaintiff) has an automobile insurance policy with Travelers Insurance Company (Travelers). In 2005, Plainitff was injured in a car accident caused by the other driver Jonathan Wallace (defendant). Defendant was uninsured at the time of the accident.

When you purchase car insurance coverage, there are many different facets to your policy. Obviously, the more money you pay as a monthly premium, the more coverage you receive if you are involved in a car accident. Every state differs in their laws regarding the standard requirements of the type of coverage you must purchase; however, it is a growing trend for states to have statutes that set legal minimums required in car insurance coverage in order to register your vehicle.

Car insurance requirements were created in order to assure that where a driver is involved in a car accident, and that driver was at fault, the other party will be able to be compensated for medical costs and property damage arising from that accident.
Although the policy limits and minimums vary depending on the state, the most common different types of car insurance coverage available include personal injury protection (PIP) coverage, bodily injury coverage, property damage coverage, med-pay benefits, and uninsured/underinsured motorist (UM) coverage.

When you purchase UM coverage as part of your policy, your car insurance company agrees to pay a certain amount in coverage if you are involved in a car accident with an uninsured or underinsured driver. Plaintiff in this case had a UM provision in her policy, and after her accident she entered a claim with Travelers in order to receive UM benefits.

Additionally, Plaintiff brought a negligence action against the defendant for damages associated with the accident that he caused. In order to prove that her medical injuries were a result of the car accident with the defendant, there were medical records and expert testimony entered into the record.

The dispute in this case was regarding the evidence presented to prove that the plaintiff’s injuries were directly related to the accident with the defendant. Plaintiff’s counsel called her doctor to testify as to the medical issues she was suffering with since the accident. This doctor testified that the plaintiff has spinal stenosis, bone edema and post-concussion syndrome.

This doctor, as with most doctors, kept a patient chart that indicated the medical impressions and opinions of his staff. On cross examination the defendant’s counsel created a foundation for the relevance of this chart and sought to enter it into the record. Over a plaintiff objection, the record was entered into evidence.

Although the plaintiff argued that this chart was hearsay; the court held that because the medical chart was a business record regularly maintained in a medical practice, it could be validly entered into evidence.

Thus, the impressions of the doctor’s medical staff regarding the plaintiff’s injuries were released to all of the parties in the case. This led to a significantly lower award for the plaintiff because the causal link between her injuries and the car accident was skewed.
Continue reading

Contact Information