by

Probate and trust administration in Indiana can feel routine until a filing is rejected, a hearing is continued, or a family learns that a county has its own procedural requirements. State statutes set the framework, yet local court rules often control the day-to-day mechanics that determine whether a matter moves smoothly. A missed requirement can delay appointment of a personal representative, slow access to accounts, or create unnecessary friction among family members who already feel stretched.

Local rules rarely change the underlying rights of heirs, beneficiaries, or fiduciaries. Procedure still shapes how quickly those rights become practical. A personal representative may have authority on paper, while a bank waits for letters issued in the precise format the clerk requires. A trustee may need court guidance, while the court expects filings to follow local filing sequence and formatting rules. Families who know what to expect at the county level tend to avoid avoidable setbacks.

Indiana Probate Court Local Rules

Continue reading

by

When a trust holds real estate, families often expect administration to feel straightforward. A house or parcel is held in the trust; the trustee manages it, and distributions occur later. Disputes can look very different once land use, permitting, easements, or environmental restrictions are factored in. A recent Indiana Court of Appeals decision involving trustees seeking judicial review of a zoning decision shows how quickly trust-owned property can trigger high-stakes conflict over development plans, compliance, and the trustee’s role.

Trust ownership does not insulate property from local regulation, neighbor pressure, or county enforcement. Trustees still have to act within the trust’s authority while also meeting the rules that apply to the land itself.

Indiana Trust-Owned Real Estate Disputes

Continue reading

by

Financial institutions have tightened their verification and authentication procedures following several well-publicized fraud incidents between 2024 and 2025. These policy shifts now influence how personal representatives, surviving spouses, and agents under powers of attorney access accounts after a customer dies. Indiana families may notice that tasks which once required a simple set of documents now demand multiple forms of proof, repeated communication with support teams, or additional in-person authentication. Understanding these requirements helps reduce administrative delays and provides families with a more straightforward path through the estate process.

Institutions adopted these changes because attempted account takeovers increased nationwide. Fraudsters targeted accounts belonging to deceased customers, especially those tied to online banking platforms and mobile verification tools, which exposed gaps in older security practices. As a result, banks, credit unions, and fintech providers rolled out stronger identity checks before they release information or funds to anyone claiming authority over an account. Families now deal with a more structured, sometimes slower process when they settle a loved one’s affairs, which is one reason it helps to speak with an estate planning attorney who understands how these verification rules affect real-world administration.

Verification Standards Have Expanded Across Traditional Banks And Fintech Platforms

Continue reading

by

Digital estate audits have become one of the most critical developments in estate planning in 2025. Families now generate value in ways that traditional documents never contemplated, and many do not realize how much of their wealth exists online. Artificial intelligence tools, subscription platforms, cloud storage systems, cryptocurrency, and monetized digital content have created a new category of property. Courts and financial institutions have responded with updated verification requirements, and personal representatives must now navigate policies that feel more like cybersecurity procedures than classic estate administration.

These changes affect every family, but the impact becomes significant when the decedent created AI-generated content, operated multiple digital accounts, or held assets protected by multi-factor authentication. Understanding how digital estate audits work helps families plan and protect information that might otherwise become inaccessible during administration.

Digital Estate Audits Are Becoming Standard For Modern Administration

Continue reading

by

Indiana recently updated its probate code, and those changes took effect on July 1, 2025. The amendments refine how wills are interpreted, how estates are administered, and how courts handle filings and closing procedures. These updates modernize estate administration across the state, giving families clearer direction and streamlining several technical requirements. If you already have a will or you serve as a personal representative for a loved one’s estate, understanding the new rules can help you avoid costly mistakes and delays.

Key Updates In The 2025 Indiana Probate Amendments

The 2025 legislative session produced a series of changes under Indiana Code Title 29. Lawmakers aimed to align state law with current probate practices and improve the administration of supervised and unsupervised estates. The revisions address several areas that affect both personal representatives and beneficiaries.

Continue reading

by

The Indiana Court of Appeals recently issued a decision that highlights how disputes can unfold when families manage supervised estates. In Daniel L. Stephan v. Douglas Stephan, et al., the court explained what happens when heirs disagree over property control and how courts oversee the personal representative’s actions. The ruling shows that even straightforward estate plans can create conflict when asset management, authority, or documentation are handled inconsistently.

Overview of The Stephan Estate Dispute

The Stephan family’s case began as a supervised estate proceeding in Indiana. Supervised administration means the court must approve significant steps taken by the personal representative, including asset transfers, distributions, and closing documents. Disagreement arose over how property should be handled and whether one family member overstepped their role. The appeal focused on the trial court’s oversight duties and the limits on an individual’s authority within a supervised estate.

Continue reading

by

A recent crash right across the state line took the life of an Indiana motorcyclist. A vehicle crossed the center line on a rural road and collided head-on with the motorcycle. The rider was pronounced dead at the scene, leaving family and friends in grief and financial distress. If you are faced with a similar loss, you may still have legal options in Indiana courts even when the crash occurred elsewhere.

Indiana allows wrongful death claims when the decedent was a resident, and damages often reflect Indiana standards regarding loss of support and emotional suffering. That matters even if the accident happened in another state. Your family may recover for medical costs, funeral expenses, lost income, and pain or suffering under Indiana law. Fatal motorcycle accidents frequently result from a driver’s violation of lane safety and lack of care, not just misfortune. It is critical to understand what factors may strengthen or weaken a wrongful death claim.

What Happens When a Crash Involves an Indiana Resident

When a crash occurs just outside Indiana but involves an Indiana rider or resident, you must consider how Indiana law may still govern certain aspects of the case. The accident site usually sets the procedures for liability and initial claims, but a nearby state’s law may not extend to damages calculated here. If the deceased lived in Indiana and was financially connected to Indiana residents, courts may allow the case to go forward under Indiana remedies. That can significantly affect the amount and type of damages available.

Continue reading

by

A landmark decision from the Indiana Supreme Court outlines how medical malpractice victims may recover maximum compensation when more than one provider contributes to an injury. In Abbas v. Neter‑Nu, the court upheld a jury verdict in favor of the patient but clarified how prejudgment interest and liability caps apply when multiple healthcare professionals share responsibility.

If you suffered harm due to mistreatment by several providers, understanding this ruling is essential before seeking damages recovery in Indiana courts.

What the Court Ruled in Abbas v. Neter‑Nu

In a case involving a below-knee amputation following negligent medical care, the Supreme Court affirmed the jury’s decision and made key clarifications. First, the court confirmed that if multiple healthcare professionals are at fault, each may be held fully liable up to the statutory cap. Second, prejudgment interest must be calculated based on each defendant’s capped liability separately, not jointly.

Continue reading

by

If you lost a loved one or suffered injuries in a crash caused by someone who disregarded a stop sign, you may have legal options under Indiana law. Earlier this month in Elkhart County, two people were killed and two others injured when a vehicle entered the intersection of County Roads 40 and 17 without stopping. Police reported that the vehicle failed to obey a posted stop sign before colliding with another car. This tragedy illustrates how quickly negligent driving decisions can result in devastating consequences and why victims and families should understand their rights.

How Stop Sign Violations Create Legal Liability

Stop signs exist to regulate intersections and prevent dangerous collisions. When a driver ignores one, they create a foreseeable risk of harm to others. Indiana traffic laws require drivers to stop fully, yield to oncoming vehicles, and proceed only when safe. Failing to do so is considered negligence. In civil court, proving negligence involves showing that the driver had a duty to obey the traffic law, breached that duty by failing to stop, and caused injuries or fatalities as a result. In cases like the Elkhart County crash, the sequence of events often makes that negligence clear.

Continue reading

by

Several people were injured on July 6, 2025, when a JB Hunt semi-truck collided with multiple vehicles and overturned on I-65 near Lowell, Indiana. The crash shut down both directions of the interstate, causing significant delays during a busy travel weekend. If you were involved in a crash like this one and suffered injuries, contact an attorney if you need help dealing with medical bills, missed work, or pushy insurance companies.

Multiple Injuries Reported After Highway Collision Involving JB Hunt Truck

The crash occurred in the northbound lanes just after 3 p.m. Police say the driver of the semi veered into a guardrail, lost control, and struck at least three passenger vehicles before overturning across the roadway. One of the impacted vehicles hit a concrete divider, while another was forced off the road.

Continue reading
Contact Information
8320 Kennedy Ave
Highland, IN 46322
Phone: 219-836-2200
Fax: 219-836-9388

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2015 – 2026, Padove Law
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design