With increasing frequency, older couples are choosing to separate after several decades together. Our Hammond divorce lawyers recognize that in some respects, these cases are simpler, mainly for the fact that young children are not part of the equation. A lack of a custody battle ratchets down the potential for…
Indiana Injury And Family Lawyer Blog
Stanley v. Stanley – Fraudulent Conveyance of Property Pre-Divorce
In some ways, divorce proceedings are much like that of a bankruptcy. Both can involve the litigation of highly personal matters, and both require intense, third-party analysis of your finances. In both scenarios, once a filing is made, every financial decision you make thereafter – and some you made before…
Equitable Distribution in Divorce Weighed by Indiana Appellate Court
When exploring the possibility of filing for divorce in Indiana, one primary consideration is the way in which courts divvy up property accrued during the marriage. The courts have established that the goal is equitable distribution, which some mistake to mean “equal distribution.” This is not so. Hammond divorce attorneys…
Indiana Divorce Involving Co-Owners of Business
When married, co-entrepreneurs are busy getting their business off the ground, they often don’t consider what might happen if they divorce. It’s understandably not a pleasant scenario to consider, particularly when things are going well. However, a family-owned business run by married couples can quickly tank if the divorce is…
Bifurcated Divorce in Indiana Can be Beneficial
There are some situations in which a divorce decree may be needed or desired sooner than all of the property issues can be settled. For these couples, it is possible to seek a bifurcated divorce. Hammond divorce attorneys know that while many couples may want the entire matter done and…
Daniel v. Daniel – Military Benefits as Marital Property in Divorce
Those filing for divorce in Hammond against a military spouse should be aware of the fact that unvested military benefits may be considered marital property for purposes of asset division. The issue arose way back in 1981 with the case of McCarty v. McCarty in the U.S. Supreme Court, where…
Termination of Parental Rights in Indiana
The Indiana Supreme Court recently reversed and remanded decisions in two similar family law cases regarding termination of parental rights due to a technical legal error. This means both individuals in question will have the opportunity to once again assert to the court why the state should allow them to…
Transmutation of Non-Marital Property in Indiana Divorce
As a general rule, the only property in a divorce proceeding that is subject to division is marital property. The question of what exactly constitutes marital property is one that family courts continue to wrestle with on a daily basis. For the most part, however, marital property is considered that…
Mottershaw v. Ledbetter – Improper Evidence Exposure in Injury Case
Preservation of the integrity of the judicial process means that jurors should only weigh that evidence which is considered relevant to the case. Extraneous information could be unfairly prejudicial. It’s the judge’s job to act as referee to make sure this doesn’t happen. Usually, the question of what can and…
Claims for Indiana Medical Errors Must Clear Pre-Trial Hurdles
It is not enough in medical malpractice lawsuits for the plaintiff to simply provide evidence of wrong-doing or negligence. Before you even get to court, your law firm must clear a number of critical hurdles. There are statutes of limitations on the lawsuit, but there are also numerous deadlines for…