The Indiana Court of Appeals has affirmed a lower court decision in Laesch v. Laesch, finding a husband must: Pay interest on his monthly payments to his wife, because he did not pay each in a lump sum; Be held in contempt for failure to obtain a life insurance policy…
Indiana Injury And Family Lawyer Blog
Peterson v. Peterson – Failure to Pay Spousal Support
Spousal support, once a critical aspect of any divorce case, has waned in recent years as both spouses often work outside the home and contribute somewhat equally to the financial stability of the household. Where husbands once were always required to pay spousal support – and often for many years…
Seal v. Seal: Early Military Retirement Payable to Ex-Spouse
The Indiana Court of Appeals has affirmed that a former husband’s early military retirement pay is in fact payable to his ex-spouse, per their Indiana divorce agreement, despite the husband arguing it was not. In the case of Seal v. Seal, the court ruled that the terms of the original…
Wallerstedt v. Wallerstedt – Relocation in Indiana Child Custody Cases
When the custodial parent of a minor child in Indiana plans to move to a new residence, that parent must understand his or her rights or obligations with respect to child custody. As of July 1, 2006, a parent with custody or court-approved parenting time with a minor has to first…
Martinez v. Cahue – Child Custody and Relocation to Another Country
In Indiana, when a custodial parent wishes to move either out of state or out of the country, he or she needs to comply with Indiana Code Chapter 31-17-2.2, which requires notification of the courts and the other parent. The law applies whether parents are divorced, separated, or never married. In cases…
Sieglein v. Schmidt – Child Support of Baby Born Via In Vitro Fertilization
In 2016, there are many different ways of becoming a parent. Beyond the so-called “traditional method,” there is adoption, surrogacy, and in vitro fertilization. With the advancement of technology, the legal sphere has been slower to catch up, but there has been some precedent set to settle disputes that arise.…
Nolan v. Huff – Paramours Complicate Indiana Child Custody Cases
When it comes to issues of parenting rights, child custody, visitation time, and child support, there are many sensitive and complicated angles to consider. One that Hammond family law attorneys sometimes see crop up is when one parent becomes involved with a new paramour, be it a boyfriend or girlfriend…
Andrick v. Andrick – Indiana Child Custody Modification Order Affirmed in Part, Remanded in Part
When it comes to matters of child custody, the wishes of the child – particularly that of a child over the age of 14 – are some of the main statutory factors the court will consider when modifications are requested. This is not to say that Indiana child custody modifications…
Luttrell v. Cucco – Same-Sex Couple Cohabitation Affects Spousal Support Payments
Last year, a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision opened the doors for same-sex partners across the country to obtain a marriage license – and to have those marriages recognized in any state across the country. Since that ruling, many same-sex couples have married in Indiana. But there are still some…
Ahls v. Ahls – Appeals Court Favors Wife in Indiana Divorce Settlement
The Indiana Court of Appeals ruled the family trial court erred in its application of a financial formula on a husband’s retirement accounts. For this reason, in Ahls v. Ahls, the appellate court ruled wife should receive $115,000 more than she was granted in the original divorce settlement. This is…